Headlines  |  Bills  |  Leg. Votes  |  Code/Laws  |  ElectionTrack   |  About   |  Feedback
Create Account  Log In
Get the free THE NOONER daily e-mail update of aroundthecapitol headlines:
   

help wanted - php/mysql geek with interest in politics

Comments/questions on AB 2223

Get free e-mail updates on AB 2223


No Spam Privacy Policy







california political news, opinion,
laws & legislation
california legislation > AB 2223

Create a free account to track bills.
AB 2223 (Nava)
Wildlife management areas: nontoxic shot.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


AB 2223, as amended, Nava. Wildlife management areas: nontoxic
shot.
The Ridley-Tree Condor Preservation Act requires the use of
nonlead centerfire rifle and pistol ammunition when taking big game
and coyote within specified areas. Existing law generally provides
that a violation of the fish and game laws is a crime.
This bill, commencing July 1, 2011, would prohibit the possession
or use of any shotgun shell loaded with anything other than nontoxic
shot, as defined, when taking migratory game birds, resident small
game, or nongame species under the authority of a hunting license
within a wildlife management area, as defined. Under the bill, a
person who violates that prohibition would be guilty of an infraction
punishable by a $500 fine for the first offense. Because the
act bill would create a new crime, this
bill would create impose a
state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local
agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the
state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that
reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this
act for a specified reason.



Comments/questions on AB 2223 (Nava): Wildlife management areas: nontoxic shot.

 

Bill Text:

  • 06/23/10 - Amended Senate (pdf)
  • 05/28/10 - Amended Assembly (pdf)
  • 04/19/10 - Amended Assembly (pdf)
  • 04/05/10 - Amended Assembly (pdf)
  • 02/18/10 - Introduced (pdf)

  • Bill Location:

  • Sen Natural Resources and Water

  • Last Action:

  • 06/29/10: From committee without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).

  • Votes
  • 06/22/10 - Sen Natural Resources and Water: 7-0 (PASS)
  • 06/29/10 - Sen Natural Resources and Water: 3-4 (FAIL)
  • 06/22/10 - Sen Natural Resources and Water: 4-3 (FAIL)
  • 05/28/10 - Asm Appropriations: 12-5 (PASS)
  • 06/03/10 - Assembly Floor: 47-29 (PASS)
  • 04/13/10 - Asm Water, Parks and Wildlife: 8-4 (PASS)


  • Bill Analysis
  • 06/25/10 - Sen. Natural Resources And Water
  • 06/18/10 - Sen. Natural Resources And Water
  • 06/01/10 - Assembly Floor Analysis
  • 06/01/10 - Assembly Floor Analysis
  • 05/04/10 - Appropriations
  • 04/12/10 - Water, Parks And Wildlife

  •  

    E-mail this bill to a friend

    Top Headlines

    1. Brown Recruits Hispanic Activists To Gov Campaign
    2. Bid Denied To Force Brown, Schwarzenegger To Appeal Prop. 8
    3. Boxer Continues Criticism Of Gop Challenger Fiorina
    4. Former Democratic Lawmaker Parra To Help Whitman
    5. First Take: Boxer and Fiorina debate. End-of-session wrap-up.
    6. Meg Whitman Called Back To Court For Jury Duty
    7. Court won't force Brown, Schwarzenegger to defend Prop 8
    8. If You Don't Like Tax Increases, Why Would You Vote for a Republican Governor?
    9. Session ends with pork and petty politics
    10. Jerry Brown Touts Latino Support In Oakland
    Comments