SB 80 (Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review) Community redevelopment: Education Revenue Augmentation Fund.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
SB 80, as amended, Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review. Budget Act of 2009. Community redevelopment: Education Revenue Augmentation Fund. (1) Existing property tax law requires the county auditor, for each fiscal year, to allocate property tax revenue to local jurisdictions in accordance with specified formulas and procedures, and generally requires that each jurisdiction be allocated an amount equal to the total of the amount of revenue allocated to that jurisdiction in the prior fiscal year, subject to certain modifications, and that jurisdiction's portion of the annual tax increment, as defined. Existing law requires a redevelopment agency to make a remittance, as determined by the Director of Finance prior to May 10, to the county Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF) for the 2008-09 fiscal year and authorizes a legislative body to remit, in lieu of making that payment prior to May 10, 2009, a designated amount to the county auditor for deposit in the county ERAF. This bill instead would require a redevelopment agency to make the remittance on or before June 30, 2009 of that fiscal year. The bill would require the county auditor-controller to distribute funds that are remitted to the county ERAF by a city-operated or county-operated redevelopment agency only to a K-12 school district, as defined, that is located partially or entirely within the project area of the redevelopment agency in an amount proportional to the average daily attendance of each school district. The bill would require the county superintendent of schools to provide the average daily attendance reported for each school district as of the Second Proportional Apportionment for the 2008-09 fiscal year to the county auditor-controller. The bill would require the county auditor-controller to notify, on or before October 1, 2009, the Department of Finance of the amount of funding apportioned to each school district pursuant to this act. The bill would also require, for the 2008-09 fiscal year, the amount apportioned by the Superintendent of Public Instruction to each school district pursuant to a specified provision of existing law and, for purposes of making the computations required by Section 8 of Article XVI of the California Constitution, specified General Fund revenues appropriated for school districts, to be reduced by the total amount of ERAF moneys a school district receives, regardless of the actual date the funds are received from each redevelopment agency. By imposing new duties upon local tax officials and school districts with regard to the annual allocation of these revenues, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. (3) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute. This bill would express the intent of the Legislature to enact statutory changes relating to the Budget Act of 2009.
Comments/questions on SB 80 (Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review): Community redevelopment: Education Revenue Augmentation Fund.