Headlines  |  Bills  |  The Nooner  |  Code/Laws  |  ElectionTrack $$$   |  Elections  |  About   |  Contact Scott |  
OR: Create Account  Log In

Get Scott's free daily lunchtime California Capitol news update, THE NOONER:
   

Donate to Scott's coffee fund.

Follow This Bill

Get free e-mail updates on AB 568
Current number of followers of AB 568: 11


No Spam Privacy Policy


Spread the Word

Email this bill to a friend


Bump this page in Google:

Join the Community

Comments or questions on AB 568?



join the cool folks
and advertise on aroundthecapitol.com

scott's reading list

  1. California Crackup: How Reform Broke the Golden State and How We Can Fix It
  2. That Used to Be Us: How America Fell Behind in the World It Invented and How We Can Come Back
  3. Coast of Dreams
  4. Golden Dreams: California in an Age of Abundance, 1950-1963 (Americans and the California Dream)
  5. Willie Brown: A Biography
  6. The secret boss of California;: The life and high times of Art Samish,

california political news, opinion,
laws & legislation
california legislation > AB 568

help
Log in using Facebook (upper right) or create a free account to track bills.
AB 568 (Mitchell and Skinner)
Pregnant inmates and wards: least restrictive restraints.

Existing law requires the Corrections Standards Authority, and commencing July 1, 2012, the Board of State and Community Corrections, to establish minimum standards for state and local correctional facilities, including standards restricting the shackling of women in labor, during childbirth, and while in recovery after giving birth, and to review those standards biennially and make any appropriate revisions, as specified.

This bill would require that the standards ensure that women who are pregnant not be shackled by the wrists, ankles, around the abdomen, or to another person, including during time spent outside a correctional facility, during transport to or from a correctional facility, during labor, delivery, and while in recovery after giving birth, except that the least restrictive restraints possible may be used when deemed necessary for the inmate, consistent with the legitimate security needs of the inmate, the staff, and the public, and the restraints would only remain in place as long as the threat exists. The bill would require the authority, and later the board, to develop these standards regarding the shackling of pregnant women as part of its biennial review of its standards.

Under existing law, pregnant inmates of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, wards of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Division of Juvenile Facilities, and wards in the custody of a local juvenile facility, are to be transported in the least restrictive way possible when being taken to a hospital for purposes of childbirth.

This bill would prohibit inmates and wards of these facilities who are known to be pregnant from being shackled by the wrists, ankles, around the abdomen, or to another person, unless deemed necessary for the safety and security of the inmate or ward, the staff, and the public. If restraints are deemed necessary, the bill would require the least restrictive means be used, consistent with the legitimate security needs of each inmate or ward, and the restraints would only remain in place as long as the threat exists. The bill would provide that these provisions are applicable to movement within the correctional facility, transport to and from the facility, time spent outside the facility to receive medical or dental care, to attend court, or other appointments.

Comment on AB 568 (Mitchell and Skinner) via Facebook
Comment on AB 568 (Mitchell and Skinner) via Disqus
Bill Text
  • Latest version: 08/29/11 - Enrolled
  • 08/16/11 - Amended Senate (pdf)
  • 05/27/11 - Amended Senate (pdf)
  • 02/16/11 - Introduced (pdf)

  • Bill Location
  • Assembly Desk

  • Last Action:
  • 10/09/11: Vetoed by Governor.

  • Votes
  • 08/25/11 - Assembly Floor: 78-0 (PASS)
  • 08/22/11 - Senate Floor: 37-0 (PASS)
  • 06/07/11 - Sen Public Safety: 6-0 (PASS)
  • 05/12/11 - Assembly Floor: 70-0 (PASS)
  • 05/04/11 - Asm Appropriations: 17-0 (PASS)
  • 04/12/11 - Asm Public Safety: 7-0 (PASS)

  • Bill Analysis
  • 10/19/11 - Assembly Floor Analysis
  • 08/24/11 - Assembly Floor Analysis
  • 08/17/11 - Sen. Floor Analyses
  • 06/28/11 - Sen. Floor Analyses
  • 06/06/11 - Sen. Public Safety
  • 05/03/11 - Appropriations
  • 04/11/11 - Public Safety
  • 04/11/11 - Public Safety
  • Top Headlines

    1. Steinberg says Democrats seek alternatives to some budget cuts
    2. Even with tax, California faces chronic deficits
    3. Steinberg
    4. University of Calif confronts budget shortfall
    5. Poll: Should unionized California state workers get a vote on Jerry Brown's furlough plan?
    6. University of California confronts budget deficit
    7. Iowa Governor Warns California: We Are Coming To Take Your Jobs [updated]
    8. Wealthy GOP Donor Jumps Into Beth Gaines' Assembly Race
    9. California Lawmaker Proposes To Limit Out-of-state Freshmen At Uc
    10. Video
    Comments