Headlines  |  Bills  |  Leg. Votes  |  Code/Laws  |  ElectionTrack   |  About   |  Feedback
Create Account  Log In
Get the free THE NOONER daily e-mail update of aroundthecapitol headlines:
   

Get free e-mail updates on AB 1361


No Spam Privacy Policy







california political news & opinion
Read. Create. Discuss.
california legislation > AB 1361

Create a free account to track bills.
AB 1361 (Portantino)
Vehicles: commercial vehicle ban: State Route 2.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


AB 1361, as amended, Portantino. Vehicles: commercial vehicle ban:
State Route 2.
(1) Existing law authorizes the Department of Transportation to
declare and fix a weight limit for a highway under its jurisdiction
that is less than the maximum weight limits otherwise authorized
under the Vehicle Code, upon determining that the highway will not
sustain those maximum weights and, after conducting a public hearing
on the issue, determining the maximum weight that the highway will
sustain. The department is prohibited from establishing a maximum
weight limit that is less than 16,000 pounds. A violation of the
Vehicle Code is a crime.
This bill would prohibit, with specified exemptions, the operation
of a commercial vehicle with 3 or more axles, or a gross vehicle
weight or a combined gross weight of 9,000 pounds or more on the
segment of State Route 2 that is located between Interstate Route 210
(I-210) in the City of La Canada Flintridge and County Route N4 (Big
Pine Highway) in the County of Los Angeles. The bill would provide
that, upon conviction, a violation of the above prohibition is
subject to a fine of $1,000. Because the bill would create a new
crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The
bill would require the department to erect suitable signs to give
adequate notice of the prohibition.
(2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse
local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the
state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that
reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this
act for a specified reason.
(3) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately
as an urgency statute.

 

Bill Text:

  • 08/06/09 - Chaptered (pdf)
  • 07/17/09 - Enrolled (pdf)
  • 07/09/09 - Amended Senate (pdf)
  • 06/30/09 - Amended Senate (pdf)
  • 06/23/09 - Amended Senate (pdf)
  • 05/13/09 - Amended Assembly (pdf)
  • 05/04/09 - Amended Assembly (pdf)
  • 04/20/09 - Amended Assembly (pdf)
  • 04/14/09 - Amended Assembly (pdf)
  • 02/27/09 - Introduced (pdf)

  • Bill Location:

  • Secretary of State

  • Last Action:

  • 08/06/09: Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 146, Statutes of 2009.

  • Votes
  • 07/16/09 - Assembly Floor: 70-0 (PASS)
  • 07/16/09 - Senate Floor: 33-1 (PASS)
  • 07/06/09 - Sen Appropriations: 11-0 (PASS)
  • 06/16/09 - Sen Transportation and Housing: 11-0 (PASS)
  • 05/21/09 - Assembly Floor: 75-0 (PASS)
  • 05/20/09 - Asm Appropriations: 15-0 (PASS)
  • 04/27/09 - Asm Transportation: 13-0 (PASS)


  • Bill Analysis
  • 07/16/09 - Assembly Floor Analysis
  • 07/09/09 - Sen. Floor Analyses
  • 07/06/09 - Sen. Appropriations
  • 06/11/09 - Sen. Transportation And Housing
  • 05/21/09 - Assembly Floor Analysis
  • 05/19/09 - Appropriations
  • 05/12/09 - Transportation
  • 04/24/09 - Transportation

  •  

    E-mail this bill to a friend

    Top Headlines

    1. Millions pouring in to sway Democrats on health care
    2. Judge orders new wording in summary of Prop. 14
    3. Millions Spent to Sway Democrats on Health Care
    4. Another View: Initiatives Don't Need 'reining In' By Courts
    5. Hollywood Rallies Around Boxer
    6. Legislative Push Aims To Tax Internet Sales In California
    7. Contractors tied to effort to track and kill militants
    8. As Health Vote Awaits, Future of a Presidency Waits, Too
    9. Valley Democrats Cardoza And Costa Are Key To Big Health Care Vote
    10. Bill Aims To Fight Chino Hills Electrical Tower Construction