Headlines  |  Bills  |  Leg. Votes  |  Code/Laws  |  ElectionTrack   |  About   |  Feedback
Create Account  Log In
Get the free THE NOONER daily e-mail update of aroundthecapitol headlines:
   

help wanted - php/mysql geek with interest in politics

Comments/questions on AB 114

Get free e-mail updates on AB 114


No Spam Privacy Policy







california political news, opinion,
laws & legislation
california legislation > AB 114

Create a free account to track bills.
AB 114 (Carter)
Juvenile court law: purpose.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


AB 114, as amended, Carter. Juvenile court law: purpose.
Existing law sets forth the purpose of juvenile court law, and
provides that a minor under the jurisdiction of the juvenile court
who is in need of protective services shall receive care, treatment,
and guidance consistent with his or her best interest and the best
interest of the public. Existing law provides that a minor under the
jurisdiction of the juvenile court as a consequence of delinquent
conduct shall, in conformity with the interests of public safety and
protection, receive care, treatment, and guidance that is consistent
with his or her best interest, that holds the minor accountable for
his or her behavior, and that is appropriate for his or her
circumstances.
This bill would authorize a county to adopt a restorative justice
program to address the needs of minors, victims, and the community.
The bill would require the restorative justice program to be
implemented through a restorative justice protocol developed by the
juvenile court in conjunction with the prosecutor, public defender,
and other interested groups. The bill would prohibit the use of
General Fund moneys to fund the program. The bill would include
related findings and declarations.



Comments/questions on AB 114 (Carter): Juvenile court law: purpose.

 

Bill Text:

  • 08/31/10 - Enrolled (pdf)
  • 08/19/09 - Amended Senate (pdf)
  • 05/21/09 - Amended Assembly (pdf)
  • 01/13/09 - Introduced (pdf)

  • Bill Location:

  • Assembly E&E Enrollment

  • Last Action:

  • 08/25/10: Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 54. Noes 23.)

  • Votes
  • 08/25/10 - Assembly Floor: 54-23 (PASS)
  • 08/24/10 - Senate Floor: 26-10 (PASS)
  • 07/14/09 - Sen Public Safety: 5-2 (PASS)
  • 06/16/09 - Sen Public Safety: 5-0 (PASS)
  • 06/16/09 - Sen Public Safety: 3-2 (FAIL)
  • 05/26/09 - Assembly Floor: 57-18 (PASS)
  • 03/17/09 - Asm Public Safety: 4-0 (PASS)
  • 04/01/09 - Asm Appropriations: 11-5 (PASS)


  • Bill Analysis
  • 08/24/10 - Assembly Floor Analysis
  • 08/19/09 - Sen. Floor Analyses
  • 07/13/09 - Sen. Public Safety
  • 06/29/09 - Sen. Public Safety
  • 06/15/09 - Sen. Public Safety
  • 05/22/09 - Assembly Floor Analysis
  • 04/08/09 - Assembly Floor Analysis
  • 03/31/09 - Appropriations
  • 03/16/09 - Public Safety

  •  

    E-mail this bill to a friend

    Top Headlines

    1. Session ends with pork and petty politics
    2. Bid denied to force Brown, Schwarzenegger to appeal Prop. 8
    3. Former Democratic Lawmaker Parra To Help Whitman
    4. Cta, Flexing Political Clout, Targets Steinberg Tenure Proposal
    5. First Take: Boxer and Fiorina debate. End-of-session wrap-up.
    6. If You Don't Like Tax Increases, Why Would You Vote for a Republican Governor?
    7. Court won't force Brown, Schwarzenegger to defend Prop 8
    8. Meg Whitman Called Back To Court For Jury Duty
    9. Brown Recruits Hispanic Activists To Gov Campaign
    10. Bell Residents Applaud California's Reform Bills
    Comments