Headlines  |  Bills  |  Leg. Votes  |  Code/Laws  |  ElectionTrack   |  About   |  Feedback
Create Account  Log In
Get the free THE NOONER daily e-mail update of aroundthecapitol headlines:
   

help wanted - php/mysql geek with interest in politics

Comments/questions on AB 109

Get free e-mail updates on AB 109


No Spam Privacy Policy







california political news, opinion,
laws & legislation
california legislation > AB 109

Create a free account to track bills.
AB 109 (Feuer)
Outdoor advertising: digital advertising displays.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


AB 109, as amended, Feuer. Outdoor advertising: digital
advertising displays.
Existing law, the Outdoor Advertising Act, provides for the
regulation by the Department of Transportation of advertising
displays, as defined, within view of public highways, as specified.
This bill , until January 1, 2012, would
prohibit an advertising display that is visible from a state, county,
or city highway, as specified, from being constructed as, or
converted, enhanced, improved, modified, modernized, or altered into,
a digital advertising display, as defined , unless it complies
with a specified permitting process
. The bill, until January
1, 2012, would also prohibit an official highway changeable message
sign, as defined, from being constructed as, or converted, enhanced,
improved, modified, modernized, or altered into, a digital
advertising display for the purpose of displaying messages other than
official traffic operations or public safety messages. The bill
would also prohibit the painting, installation, or application of a
supergraphic, as defined, to an exterior building wall until the
State Fire Marshal
promulgates safety regulations
governing these signs.
The bill would provide for civil
penalties for a violation of these provisions and provide other
remedies for enforcement. The bill would also state the intent of the
Legislature.



Comments/questions on AB 109 (Feuer): Outdoor advertising: digital advertising displays.

 

Bill Text:

  • 04/23/09 - Amended Assembly (pdf)
  • 03/24/09 - Amended Assembly (pdf)
  • 01/13/09 - Introduced (pdf)

  • Bill Location:

  • Asm Governmental Organization

  • Last Action:

  • 02/02/10: From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  • Votes
  • 03/17/09 - Asm Judiciary: 7-3 (PASS)
  • 04/30/09 - Asm Governmental Organization: 3-10 (FAIL)


  • Bill Analysis
  • 04/29/09 - Governmental Organization
  • 03/16/09 - Judiciary

  •  

    E-mail this bill to a friend

    Top Headlines

    1. Session ends with pork and petty politics
    2. Bid denied to force Brown, Schwarzenegger to appeal Prop. 8
    3. Former Democratic Lawmaker Parra To Help Whitman
    4. Cta, Flexing Political Clout, Targets Steinberg Tenure Proposal
    5. First Take: Boxer and Fiorina debate. End-of-session wrap-up.
    6. If You Don't Like Tax Increases, Why Would You Vote for a Republican Governor?
    7. Court won't force Brown, Schwarzenegger to defend Prop 8
    8. Meg Whitman Called Back To Court For Jury Duty
    9. Brown Recruits Hispanic Activists To Gov Campaign
    10. Bell Residents Applaud California's Reform Bills
    Comments